There was a phase I went through where I had to have EVERY red brown shade that was out there and Glamour Check! was no exception! However, it is very dupeable to Antiqued. (L to R) Ricepaper, Femme Fi (L to R) Ricepaper, Femme Fi Glamour Check! vs. Compared to Ricepaper, I feel it is more pigmented as well. While similar to Ricepaper, Femme Fi has a buttery soft finish that literally just falls onto the brush from the pan and transfers to the lid just as easily. When I discovered Femme Fi I was simply over the moon! I had read so many great things about it online and just couldn’t wait to try it. (L to R) Satellite Dreams, Fashion Groupie (L to R) Satellite Dreams, Fashion Groupie Femme Fi vs. Is Fashion Groupie worth hunting down? No. In my experience I have found Fashion Groupie just a touch easier to work with in the crease as well.
The only real difference between these two that I could even possibly see is that Fashion Groupie leans just ever so slightly more red than Satellite Dreams, a true blue-based purple. Satellite Dreamsįashion Groupie is a dead ringer for Satellite Dreams, hands down. (L to R) Mulch, Carbonized (L to R) Mulch, Carbonized Fashion Groupie vs. I will probably swap Carbonized away at some point only because I like the purple and red tones of Mulch better. When used in looks, I feel Carbonized turns into a gray brown. Both shades are easy to work with, apply, blend, etc. I feel if you take the red tones out of Mulch, and make it darker, you’d end up with Carbonized.
#Mac post haste eyeshadow mac#
MulchĬarbonized came out in the MAC Me Over collection and is a more muted, neutral version of Mulch. (L to R) Mulch, Botanical (L to R) Mulch, Botanical Carbonized vs. Is Botanical worth hunting down? Yes, but wait for a repromote. Unfortunately, it does have a small amount of glitter in the formula but it’s not overpowering like some other shades can be.
What I love the most about Botanical is its silver leaning tendency that Mulch does not have. Using Mulch in a look that uses Botanical will give you very similar results. When I first got it, I thought it was comparable to Satin Taupe, but it leans far more purple which I feel makes it closer to Mulch, only without the red base Mulch has. Mulchīotanical really is just such a unique shade it is not an exact dupe for Mulch by any means but it’s about the closest you’ll come in the permanent collection. (L to R) Expensive Pink, Bold & Brazen (L to R) Expensive Pink, Bold & Brazen Botanical vs. There is no real differentiation between the two both apply beautifully to the lid, have a light level of pigmentation and blend away just as easily. Immediately after I purchased Bold & Brazen I knew I had made a mistake because Expensive Pink is completely identical to it. (L to R) Tilt, Birds & Berries (L to R) Tilt, Birds & Berries Bold & Brazen vs. Is Birds & Berries worth hunting down? No. I find both easy to work with but will say Birds & Berries is more of a pigmented, and slightly deeper/vibrant shade compared to Tilt. While not identical-looking, these two shades are completely interchangeable with one another. Permanent Shade (A-Z) Birds & Berries vs. If you have any dupes you’d like to add to this, you’re more than welcome to do so in the comments below! Let’s begin! 🙂 LE vs. I also want to mention that I have swapped away some LE dupes in the past and therefore did not have a few to compare for you through images, but they will be listed below the post. Please keep in mind this is not an all-inclusive list as I don’t have even 1/8 of the eyeshadows MAC has put out, more than likely, but these are the dupes I have come across. In my time collecting eyeshadows I have run across a good many dupes and have swooned over limited edition shades I saw online only to find out when they arrived I already had them.
#Mac post haste eyeshadow series#
Since I started doing the ‘If You Have This, You Don’t Need That’ series ( here and here) on the site, a very popular request that has come across from many of you is a comparison between limited edition shades to the permanent collection.
0 kommentar(er)
